EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/001244_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Sat Oct 21 08:24:09 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA055309049; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 08:24:09 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from earth.usa.net by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA055249044; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 08:24:05 -0700
Received: (from jgjones@localhost) by earth.usa.net (8.6.10/8.6.10) id JAA07550 for [e-mail]; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 09:16:32 -0600
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 09:16:32 -0600
From: James Jones/Nibbles and Bits <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: James Jones/Nibbles and Bits <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 737
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Subject: FR

[e-mail] said:

>On Fri, 20 Oct 1995, Ken VanBrocklin wrote:
>
>> I have gotten away from using field rendering. It was reccomended to
>> me some time ago to start using motion blur instead.
>
>What's the consensus on this subject?  Does Field-Rendering generate
>better-looking output than Full-Frame rendering with Motion Blur and/or
>Soft Filter?

   What about field-rendering AND motion-blur (un-dithered) at the
same time?

   (Just something I've been meaning to experiment with ...as soon
as my dang replacement PVR drive gets here... :)

   -Jim

James G. Jones
Nibbles & Bits
[e-mail]
___
* UniQWK #5134*

--
James Jones/Nibbles and Bits <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]